UPDATE: Obama won. This piece originally was titled “Does This Election Matter?” I would have done a strikethrough of the word “Does” before the “Did”, but I don’t know how to do that.
Time will tell if my worries are warranted or not. But the election has made it clear that the American people are not in a mood to be too concerned about anything that happens outside our borders. Isolationism often follows troublesome wars.
__________________________________________________
by Hans Moleman
Recently a bright young lady of my acquaintance was expressing her frustration with the present political campaigns, especially the Obama-Romney choice. She asked the question many people ask: Does it really matter?
We agreed that the economy is out of control, but also that economists don’t really know what the effects will be of any policy. As my friend Finiti says, economics, like all the “social sciences”, is not really a science. He calls it a branch of philosophy. The one thing it cannot do is conclusively answer a question about the future.
But I told her there was at least one area where I am convinced that there is a clear choice between two very different outcomes. I believe that war in the Middle East, and a possible World War, hang in the balance. And that war, like WWII, can only be prevented by those willing to use limited force before it is too late.
I cited two scenarios.
First Scenario: Obama is re-elected. Iran continues its current program of nuclear enrichment and weapons development. Israel warns that Iran is reaching the point beyond which the program cannot be stopped. Obama, to judge by his past actions, disagrees, and counsels patience and more sanctions. Obama says (privately) that if he is wrong and Israel is right, Israel will still be safe because we will deter any Iranian aggressive action.
Israel assesses the value of this assurance. It means that in the event of a successful, destructive Iranian attack on Israel, the US will retaliate with a nuclear counter-attack on Iran. Israel wonders: would Obama follow through? More importantly, would Iran believe that Obama would follow through?
What if Russia steps in and warn the US that any attack on Iran will be treated as an attack on Russia? In that case, would Obama risk a Russian counter-attack on the US just to carry out a posthumous (post-Holocaust II) commitment to punish Iran for destroying Israel?
Here the question marks stop. The clear answer is NO. US action in that case would be limited to UN resolutions, more feeble sanctions, and dithering demands that Russia stop supporting Iran.
One thing is certain. Israel knows that no other country can be counted on to prevent the annihilation of Israel. Just as Hitler knew in the 1930’s that no other nation would take action to prevent the annihilation of Europe’s Jews. Israel was founded on this principle. And Iran knows it as surely as Hitler did.
So Israel will decide Obama’s promises are not sufficient to guarantee Israel’s survival, and that it must act. Israel’s highly effective but limited military forces can severely impair Iran’s nuclear weapons program, but cannot deal a knockout punch. It would take repeated hits, at dreadful cost. Russia has already bolstered Iran’s air defenses. And Iran would feel no restraint in counter-attacking Israeli cities.
Could Israel expect Obama to stand by them while they use up their air forces in repeated attacks? Obama has made it clear that if Israel acts alone, it will be on its own.
Would the Arab street, even the “Arab Springtime” street, miss the opportunity to join what could be the final anti-Israel War? Would the US and Russia eventually be drawn in? What do you think? Continue reading ‘Obama, Romney, Israel, Iran: Did This Election Matter?’
Iran Wants To Negotiate…Again
Published January 5, 2013 Iran 1 CommentTags: Commentary, Hagel, isolationism, Israel, Jonathan Tobin, Mearsheimer, Obama, Pat Buchanan, Rope-a-dope, Walt
I see that Iran is putting out peace-talk feelers again. Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator has stated the regime’s willingness to reopen discussions with the US and Europe over Iran’s fast-track Manhattan project. For Iran, this can only mean three things. First, sanctions are hurting. Second, their bomb development needs more time. And third, they think Obama will stupidly fall for this “Rope-a-Dope” routine again.
They may be wrong about Obama. He may not be the sucker they think he is. He may be something much worse: a co-conspirator.
In the words of Jonathan Tobin in a well-titled Commentary article “Down the Garden Path with Iran Again” ,
This is a terrible thing to consider. The successor to Harry Truman and John Kennedy selling out our closest and most faithful ally, the only freedom-loving, democratic state in a region seething with fanatical haters of America? An American president siding with an apocalyptic regime as anti-Semitic as Hitler’s, against a nation willing to live in peace with its neighbors?
It is hard to believe. But how else to explain the President even considering putting Chuck Hagel in charge of the free world’s defense? Hagel, an anti-Israel, Iran-appeasing politician of the pure Pat Buchanan, Walt-Mearsheimer breed, as Secretary of Defense?
The president is clearly an isolationist, who believes that the main reason we have enemies is because we have bad friends. Left isolationists believe that we are imperialists, who cause damage whenever we use force. Hagel is of the right isolationists, believing that our “friends” are just using us for suckers. The difference is one of rhetoric, not of result.
(Hypothetical question: Is it possible to be an isolationist today without blaming our problems on Israel and abandoning them to deal with their sea of enemies alone?)
As for Iran, Israel, and Obama, we must wait (not long) to see what happens. If Obama accepts a new round of Iranian talks, or if he nominates Hagel for Defense Secretary, then Israel will know beyond a doubt that it will have to deal with Iran alone. Once again, the Zionist truth will be proven: no one but a Jewish state will defend Jews.