<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US to Israel: &#8220;You&#8217;re on Your Own&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mistermoleman.com/2009/05/01/us-to-israel-youre-on-your-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mistermoleman.com/2009/05/01/us-to-israel-youre-on-your-own/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on politics, unions, and this and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:09:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Moleman</title>
		<link>http://mistermoleman.com/2009/05/01/us-to-israel-youre-on-your-own/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mister Moleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mistermoleman.com/?p=325#comment-106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your concerns are entirely appropriate,  The question is, what does one do when faced with a job that needs doing and inadequate ability to do it?

If we are pleased to be impotent and to have few options, we will embrace the situation and &quot;learn to live with the Iranian bomb&quot;.  This is the appeaser&#039;s answer and apparently Obama&#039;s.

The other alternative is to do what you can while increasing your ability to do more.  This might mean a military build-up, including an acccelerated missile defense system, while simultaneously acting to destroy Iran&#039;s nuclear facilities and therefore at least delaying their progress until more might be done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your concerns are entirely appropriate,  The question is, what does one do when faced with a job that needs doing and inadequate ability to do it?</p>
<p>If we are pleased to be impotent and to have few options, we will embrace the situation and &#8220;learn to live with the Iranian bomb&#8221;.  This is the appeaser&#8217;s answer and apparently Obama&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The other alternative is to do what you can while increasing your ability to do more.  This might mean a military build-up, including an acccelerated missile defense system, while simultaneously acting to destroy Iran&#8217;s nuclear facilities and therefore at least delaying their progress until more might be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sully</title>
		<link>http://mistermoleman.com/2009/05/01/us-to-israel-youre-on-your-own/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sully]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mistermoleman.com/?p=325#comment-102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been a hawk for a long time; but the Iran problem appears more than merely hard. They seem very determined; which means it would take a very long and periodically renewed bombing program or else an actual occupation to push their program back very far. Meanwhile the start of such a program might push Pakistan over the edge and result in a major needed campaign there. 

I wonder if we have the forces to do both of those plus handle the likely reactions in Afghanistan and Iraq. 

for what it&#039;s worth I think George Bush&#039;s biggest mistake was in failing to oversee a significant buildup after 9/11. The couple of hundred thousand special forces he could have easily recruited and trained and the air wings and or carrier groups he could have easily built would be a big help around about now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a hawk for a long time; but the Iran problem appears more than merely hard. They seem very determined; which means it would take a very long and periodically renewed bombing program or else an actual occupation to push their program back very far. Meanwhile the start of such a program might push Pakistan over the edge and result in a major needed campaign there. </p>
<p>I wonder if we have the forces to do both of those plus handle the likely reactions in Afghanistan and Iraq. </p>
<p>for what it&#8217;s worth I think George Bush&#8217;s biggest mistake was in failing to oversee a significant buildup after 9/11. The couple of hundred thousand special forces he could have easily recruited and trained and the air wings and or carrier groups he could have easily built would be a big help around about now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

